The Open-Source AI Stack
RSS
All models

Models · Compare

Claude Opus 4.5 vs OLMo 3 32B Instruct

Rows highlighted in warm gray are where the models differ. Numbers carry their as-of date and primary source.

Specs

Field A: Claude Opus 4.5 B: OLMo 3 32B Instruct
Released 2025-11-242025-11-20
Developer AnthropicAI2
Openness ProprietaryOpen
License ProprietaryApache-2.0
OSI-approved noyes
Data released noyes
Training code noyes
Architecture unknowndense
Total params 32B
Active params
Experts
Context window 66K
Attention unknowngqa
Position enc. unknownrope
Pretraining tokens 6.0T
Post-training rlhf, constitutionalsft, dpo, rlvr
Training hardware
$/M input $5.00
$/M output $25.00
Output tok/sec 51.8

Benchmarks

Missing scores render as not reported; never inferred. Bold highlights the leader per benchmark.

General reasoning

MMLU 85.4 2025-11-20
MMLU-Pro 88.9 2026-05-21
GPQA-Diamond 81.0 2026-05-21

Code

LiveCodeBench 73.8 2026-05-21

Math

MATH 96.1 2025-11-20
AIME 2024 76.8 2025-11-20
AIME 2025 62.7 2026-05-21

Held-out / arena

IFEval 89.0 2025-11-20

Context · A

Anthropic's first Opus to cross 80 percent on SWE-Bench Verified per the lab's own numbers, released November 24 2025 at a two-thirds price cut versus Opus 4.1 ($5 / $25 per Mtok). Added an effort parameter for adjustable reasoning intensity, with medium-effort runs matching Sonnet 4.5 using 76 percent fewer output tokens.

Context · B

AI2's first 32B fully open frontier model, released November 20 2025 alongside a 7B and Base, Think, Instruct, and RL-Zero variants. Built on the Dolma 3 9.3T-token corpus (5.9T used for pretraining) and the Dolci post-training suite. All weights, data descriptions, intermediate checkpoints, and code released.

Claude Opus 4.5 detail → · OLMo 3 32B Instruct detail →