The Open-Source AI Stack
All models

Models · Compare

OpenAI o1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Rows highlighted in warm gray are where the models differ. Numbers carry their as-of date and primary source.

Specs

Field A: OpenAI o1 B: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Released —2024-12-06
Developer OpenAIMeta
Openness ProprietarySource-available
License ProprietaryLlama 3.3 Community License
OSI-approved nono
Data released nono
Training code nono
Architecture unknowndense
Total params —70B
Active params ——
Experts ——
Context window —131K
Attention unknowngqa
Position enc. unknownrope-llama3
Pretraining tokens —15.0T
Post-training rlhfsft, dpo, rejection-sampling
Training hardware —H100
$/M input $15.00—
$/M output $60.00—
Output tok/sec 75.8—

Benchmarks

Missing scores render as not reported; never inferred. Bold highlights the leader per benchmark.

General reasoning

MMLU — 86.0 2024-12-06
MMLU-Pro 84.1 2026-05-21 —
GPQA-Diamond 77.3 2024-12-05 50.5 2024-12-06

Code

HumanEval — 88.4 2024-12-06
LiveCodeBench 67.9 2026-05-21 —

Math

MATH 97.0 2026-05-21 —
AIME 2024 83.3 2024-12-05 —

Context · A

The first publicly available frontier reasoning model. Trained to spend extra inference compute on a "private chain of thought" before answering, setting the template the open community would chase with R1.

Context · B

An incremental post-training refresh of the 70B class that approached 405B-class quality on several benchmarks without the deployment cost. The last dense Llama before Llama 4 went MoE.

OpenAI o1 detail → · Llama 3.3 70B Instruct detail →